Melina Minneweather: To me they don't mean anything. If you go on the homepage of yahoo they have an article about what was inaccurate on both sides.
Chanda Wittwer: really unfaithful. except for the info that: a million. Immortals won't be able to die and for this reason won't be able to sacrifice their lives. 2. Immortals do no longer exist. If an immortal ought to sacrifice their existence, then it ought to propose so significantly better, on account that they weren't meant to die, at the same time as a mortal is going to die besides so it ability heavily a lot less (in spite of the truth that still something) for them to sacrifice their existence.
Byron Fortmann: No - I worked for a polling place once apon a time, and most polls are seriously flawed.
Darren Heling: Debate polls are not only notoriously biased and inaccurate, they weaken the ENTIRE debate process. Debates USED to be about debating issues, discussing policy, and answering questions. T! hey were about swaying people with actual ideas and your mastery over the subject areas covered. Now they are about "winning" and "losing." What is the thing we always ask? "Who WON the debate" as if such a thing is actually "winnable." So now the candidates manipulate the debate process to try to look good and "win." They ignore the actual questions being asked and spin everything toward canned, pre-scripted, pre-rehearsed, pre-polled answers.By the very process of polling the debates, and especially who "won" them, we exacerbate the very weakening of the debate process. We ask them to insult and manipulate us. So for me, no, I don't find the debate polls mean anything and I further think they debase and destroy the entire point of the thing....Show more
Fannie Collingwood: no
Luis Farlow: By nothing, I mean other people's opinions, not the positions and appeals of the candidates.
No comments:
Post a Comment